Botanical Studies (2008) 49: 25-32.
*
Corresponding author: Email: jyewu@cc.ncu.edu.tw; Tel:
+886-3-422-7971; Fax: +886-3-422-8482.
INTRODUCTION
Pollen tube elongation is a crucial event in the sexual
reproduction of flowering plants. It begins when pollen
germinates on the stigma and then continues to penetrate
the stigmatic tissue, style, and transmitting tract. Finally,
the pollen tube reaches the ovule and delivers the genetic
material for fertilization. Pollen tube elongation involves
many specialized mechanisms that control growth and
navigation in order for the pollen tube to reach the
dedicated destination. These features make the pollen tube
a unique system for the study of not only male fertility in
plants, but also many other distinctive aspects of biology
(Franklin-Tong, 1999; Edlund et al., 2004). One of them
is that, while most plant cells expand through a diffuse
growth mechanism, pollen tube elongation occurs only at
the utmost apex of the tube through a polarized tip growth
mechanism (Hepler et al., 2001).
Because the pollen tube¡¦s growth is restricted to the
tube apex, many molecules must be translocated to the
growing tip. For example, pectic polysaccharides are
assembled in the Golgi apparatus, then transported in
vesicles, and subsequently released at the growing tip
through exocytosis (Sterling et al., 2001). This process
is essential because pectin is a major component of the
cell wall at the growing pollen tube tip (Ferguson et al.,
1998). In addition to the cell wall materials, vesicles
are responsible for carrying nascent membranes with
embedded proteins and secretory molecules to the growing
tube tip. Pollen tube growth also involves the recycling of
excess membranes and uptake of female derived molecules
through endocytosis (Derksen et al., 1995; Parton et al.,
2001). It has been well characterized that an inverted
cone-shaped region adjoining the pollen tube apex is
devoid of organelles and almost exclusively occupied by
vesicles (Franklin-Tong, 1999). These vesicles must retain
their individual specificity so that each of them can find
and fuse with its unique target membrane and deliver its
cargo to its designated compartment during pollen tube tip
growth.
Current models indicate that the recognition between
a vesicle and a target membrane is initially mediated
by tethering factors. Tethering factors can be generally
Arabidopsis HIT1, a putative homolog of yeast tethering
protein Vps53p, is required for pollen tube elongation
Lian-Chin WANG
1
, Ching-Hui YEH
1
, Ronald J. SAYLER
2
, Ya-Yun LEE
1
, Chung-An LU
1
, and
Shaw-Jye WU
1,
*
1
Department of Life Sciences, National Central University, No. 300, Jhong-da Road, Jhong-li City, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
2
Department of Plant Pathology, 217 Plant Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
(Received March 27, 2007; Accepted September 29, 2007)
ABSTRACT.
The Arabidopsis HIT1 gene encodes a protein that is homologous to the yeast tethering factor
Vps53p, which is involved in retrograde vesicle trafficking from the endosome to the trans-Golgi network.
Although the ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenized hit1-1 allele can be maintained homozygously, T-DNA
insertional hit1-2 and hit1-3 mutants can only be isolated as hemizygous lines. No heterozygous progeny
were produced in outcrosses to wild-type plants using pollen from either hit1-2 or hit1-3 heterozygotes. The
reciprocal cross using pollen from wild-type plants on either hit1-2 or hit1-3 mutants produced heterozygous
and wild-type progeny. In reproductive tissues, HIT1 promoter-driven GUS activity was detected only in
mature pollen and elongated pollen tubes. In vitro pollen germination further showed that only half the pollen
grains from hit1-2 and hit1-3 heterozygote plants produced normal pollen tubes. In contrast, the pollen tube
length of pollen grains from the hit1-1 mutant was reduced compared to that of the wild type. These results
suggest that HIT1 may govern a vesicle trafficking event that is required for pollen tube tip growth during
male gametogenesis and that disruption of HIT1 results in male specific transmission defect. Moreover, while
the hit1-1 mutant is partially functional leading to reduced pollen tube length, hit1-2 and hit1-3 are total-loss-
of-function alleles.
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; Pollen tube; Tip growth; Vesicle tethering factor; Yeast Vps53p protein.
Abbreviations: hit, heat-intolerant; GARP, Golgi-associated retrograde protein; TGN, trans-Golgi network;
VPS, vesicular protein sorting.
PHYSIOLOGY
pg_0002
26
Botanical Studies, Vol. 49, 2008
divided into a group of extended coiled-coil proteins
and a class of oligomeric complexes. These tethers act
to establish physical links, over considerable distances,
between two membranes that are due to fuse (Sztul and
Lupashin, 2006). Despite the fact that many of these
regulators have been identified in plants through genomic
analysis, the question of which of them are essential and
what biological roles they play during pollen tube tip
growth has yet to be resolved. Only POK, a putative
homolog of yeast Vps52p in the Golgi-associated
retrograde protein (GARP) complex, and AtSEC8, a
subunit of the putative exocyst complex, have recently
been shown to regulate pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis
(Lobstein et al., 2004; Cole et al., 2005).
Previously, an ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)
mutagenized hit1-1 (heat-intolerant) mutant, the growth
of which had been inhibited by high temperatures,
was isolated from Arabidopsis (Wu et al., 2000). The
mutated gene was later identified to encode a homolog of
the yeast tethering factor Vps53p (Lee et al., 2006). In
yeast, Vps51p, Vps52p, Vps53p and Vps54p constitute
a tetrameric GARP tethering complex. This complex
interacts with a SNARE and a Rab GTPase to mediate
retrograde vesicle trafficking from the endosome to the
trans-Golgi network (TGN) (Conibear and Stevens, 2000;
Siniossoglou and Pelham, 2001; Conibear et al., 2003).
Although hit1-1 mutant can be maintained homozygously,
T-DNA insertional hit1-2 and hit1-3 mutants are like the
T-DNA insertional pok mutant that can only be isolated as
a hemizygous line. This finding suggests that HIT1 may
also be involved in pollen tube growth. Here we provide
evidence to support this hypothesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials and growth conditions
The wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana plants used in
this study were in the Colombia-0 background. Seeds
were obtained from the Lehle Seeds Company (Round
Rock, TX, USA). The hit1-1 mutant line was isolated
from the F
2
progeny of plants mutagenized with EMS, as
described (Wu et al., 2000). The T-DNA insertion alleles
hit1-2 (GABI_100C01) and hit1-3 (SALK_047230)
were obtained from the Max-Planck Institute, Cologne,
Germany (Rosso et al., 2003) and the Arabidopsis
Biological Resource Center at Ohio State University,
Columbus, Ohio, respectively. Plants were either grown in
soil or on Murashige Skoog (MS) salt agar plates at 23
o
C
under a light cycle of 16 h light/8 h dark for both wild type
and hit1-1 mutant. For the selection of T-DNA insertion
lines, seeds were pregerminated on MS-salt agar plates
with sulfadiazine (hit1-2) or kanamycin (hit1-3) according
to the suppliers¡¦ instructions.
Genotyping of T-DNA insertion hit1 mutants
The predicted HIT1 gene has 24 exons with translation
start for the HIT1 transcript located in the second exon,
based on the most current sequence information from the
Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, http://www.
Arabidopsis.org), the mutant supplier¡¦s data, and the open
reading frame derived from cloned cDNA. The hit1-2
allele has a T-DNA inserted in the eighth exon and hit1-3
allele has a T-DNA inserted in the seventh intron (Figure
1a). Genotyping of the hit1-2 lines was performed by
PCR using the HIT1-complemented forward primer (5¡¦-
GCTGGAACGGATTTTTATTTCTGG-3¡¦) and the T-DNA
left border complemented reverse primer (5¡¦-CCCATT
TGGACGTGAATGTAGACAC-3¡¦) to amplify a 601 bp
DNA fragment corresponding to the junction sequence
for hit1-2. Control PCR assays amplified the 909 bp
non-disrupted HIT1 sequence using the same forward
primer with the HIT1-complemented reverse primer (5¡¦-
ATTATTCCCGTGCCAAGTAGG-3¡¦). A similar strategy
was also applied to genotype the hit1-3 lines with HIT1-
complemented forward primer (5¡¦-CCAAACCAGCTCA
TTGTCATTTTG-3¡¦), T-DNA left border complemented
reverse primer (GCGTGGACCGCTTGCTGCAACT-
3¡¦), and HIT1-complemented reverse primer (5¡¦-
GCCTATACGGCACATGCCAAG-3¡¦).
Preparations of the HIT1 promoter construct
The promoter region of HIT1 was amplified with
gene-specific primers 5¡¦-GTGAAGCTTGGCATCAAC
Figure 1. Insertional mutations affecting the hit1 transmission is
male specific. (a) Intron-exon structure of the HIT1 gene. Solid
black lines represent introns, and gray boxes represent exons.
The positions of the point mutation in hit1-1 and the T-DNA
insertion in hit1-2 and hit1-3 are indicated, respectively. The
predicted translation start is specified by an arrow; (b) Progeny
from an outcross using HIT1/hit1-2 heterozygote anthers to
pollinate wild-type plants were genotyped by PCR using a set of
three primers to produce distinct HIT1 and hit1-2 bandings. No
heterozygous progeny were produced; (c) Heterozygous progeny
were produced in an outcross to a HIT1/hit1-2 heterozygote
using pollen from a wild-type homozygote. W, wild type; h,
HIT1/hit1-2 heterozytote; M, molecular marker.
pg_0003
WANG et al. ¡X A tethering protein homolog in male gametophyte
27
ACCATCATCTAAACA-3¡¦ and 5¡¦-GGCCTGCAGTTT
GTATGATAAAACCAAAAATCA-3¡¦ (HindIII and PstI
sites are underlined). The 2.4 kb amplified products were
resolved by electrophoresis, gel purified, and cloned into
pGEMT-Easy vector (Promega, Madison Wisconsin,
USA). After sequence verification, the fragments were
inserted upstream of the £]-Glucuronidase (GUS) reporter
gene followed by the nopaline synthase terminator in
pCAMBIA1300 Ti-derived binary vector (CAMBIA,
Canberra, Australia). Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain
GV3101 was used to deliver this construct into wild-
type plants by vacuum infiltration (Clough and Bent,
1998). Transgenic plants were selected on MS agar
medium containing 25 £gg/mL Hygromycin B for 14 days.
Resistant T1 seedlings were transferred to soil and grown
to maturity. Homozygous T2 lines were selected by
screening their T3 progeny using resistance to Hygromycin
B as the marker. T3 seeds derived from homozygous T2
lines were used for GUS assays.
Histochemical GUS assays
Agar grown whole seedlings were vacuum-infiltrated
with 1 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide
(X-gluc), 29 mM Na
2
HPO
4
, 21 mM NaH
2
PO
4
, and 0.1
% (v/v) Triton X-100 at pH 7.0 and then incubated at 37
o
C to stain for GUS activity. After staining for 4 h, the
samples were washed several times with 70% ethanol to
remove the chlorophyll. For GUS assays on pollen grains,
inflorescences were cut off and prefixed in chloroform:
ethanol:water (3:6:1, v/v/v), 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100
for 30 min followed by the vacuum-filtration and GUS
staining procedures described above (Procissi et al., 2003).
After staining, anthers at different stages were separated
from flowers, and their contents were released using a
needle under a dissecting microscope.
In vitro pollen germination
The in vitro pollen germination assay was adapted from
previous reports (Li et al., 1999; Fan et al., 2001; Johnson-
Brousseau and McCormick, 2004). The medium used for
pollen germination was prepared using double distilled
water and contained 18% (w/v) sucrose, 0.01% (w/v)
boric acid, 1 mM MgSO
4
, 1 mM CaCl
2
, 1 mM Ca(NO
3
),
and 1% (w/v) agar at pH 7. After heating at 100¢XC for 2
min, the medium was allowed to solidify on glass slides,
forming a 1-mm thick layer. Newly dehisced anthers
were detached from flowers and carefully rubbed onto
the surface of the germinating medium to transfer the
pollen grains. Following the application of pollen, the
slides were immediately put inside a box with water in the
bottom to maintain the relative humidity at 100%. The
entire assembly was then transferred to a growth chamber
at 25¢XC with constant illumination and incubated for 12 h
before examination under a light microscope.
RESULTS
Disruption of the HIT1 gene causing a male-
specific transmission defect
The hit1-2 and hit1-3 alleles can only be isolated as
hemizygous lines, and the siliques produced from the
heterozygous parental plants were fully filled with viable
seeds, suggesting that disruption of HIT1 gene by T-DNA
insertion may result in a male-specific transmission defect
(Lee et al., 2006). To verify that the transmission defect
was indeed male specific, outcrosses were performed
using pollen from hit1-2 heterozygotes to pollinate the
stigma of wild-type plants. PCR-based genotyping
revealed that no heterozygous progeny were produced
(Figure 1b). Outcrosses were also made using pollen from
wild-type plants to pollinate hit1-2 heterozygotes, and the
PCR-based genotyping revealed that both wild-type and
heterozygous progeny were produced (Figure 1c). Similar
results were also found when testing hit1-3 alleles (Table
1), confirming that the transmission defect is specifically
associated with male gametophyte. While T-DNA
insertion in the hit1-2 and hit1-3 alleles showed a strong
male transmission defect, the single base substituted allele
Table 1. Inheritance of mutant HIT1 alleles.
No. of Progeny tested
a
Genotypes of progeny
b
x
2
P
+/+ +/m m/m
Natural self cross of HIT1 heterozygotes
25% 50% 25%
Expected
HIT1/hit1-2
425
54% 46%
0%
251.8 .0.001
HIT1/hit1-3
124
53% 47%
0%
70.8 .0.001
Outcross of HIT1 heterozygotes
50% 50%
--
Expected
HIT1/hit1-2 (¡ñ) ¡Ñ WT (¡ð)
66
100% 0%
--
66.0 .0.001
HIT1/hit1-3 (¡ñ) ¡Ñ WT (¡ð)
58
100% 0%
--
58.0 .0.001
WT (¡ñ) ¡Ñ HIT1/hit1-2 (¡ð)
66
55% 45%
--
0.545
NS
c
WT (¡ñ) ¡Ñ HIT1/hit1-3 (¡ð)
54
54% 46%
--
0.296
NS
c
a
Samples are from three or more individual crosses;
b
+, HIT1; m, mutant hit1 allele;
C
NS, Not significantly different.
pg_0004
28
Botanical Studies, Vol. 49, 2008
hit1-1 was maintained homozygously. These findings
suggest that hit1-2 and hit1-3 are null alleles while hit1-1
is a partially functional allele.
The HIT1
promoter is predominately active in
the male gametophyte
The expression pattern of HIT1 was determined in
plants expressing the £]-glucuronidase reporter gene under
the control of the putative HIT1 promoter, a 2.4 kb DNA
fragment upstream of the HIT1 coding region. In 10-day-
old plantlets, the blue staining was restricted to the root
with the apex region showing enhanced intensity (Figure
2a). In mature plants, GUS staining was observed in
particular reproductive tissues at certain stages of flower
development. More specifically, blue coloration was
detected in the anthers after floral stage 11. At this time,
the petal height has exceeded that of the short stamens,
stigmatic papillae begin to appear, and meiosis of
microspore mother cell is complete, as previously defined
(Figure 2b-c) (Smyth et al., 1990; Sanders et al., 1999).
The blue color appears in the anthers as the filaments
continue to elongate rapidly through floral stage 12. GUS
staining begins to appear in the stigmatic region of the
style at floral stages 13 and 14, as the flower opens and the
long anthers extend to the stigma for pollen release. After
pollination, the style elongates, and the stigma extends
above long anthers, the landmark of floral stage 15. At
this stage, the blue coloration was still apparent in the
stigmatic region but had faded away in the anthers. The
absence of staining was due to the evacuation of pollen
grains, causing the anthers to appear translucent.
To better define the HIT1 promoter activities, GUS
stained tissues were analyzed microscopically. In the
root apex, enhanced GUS activity was observed in the
meristem and elongation zones. In contrast, GUS activity
was not detected in the root cap (Figure 3a). Microscopic
observation also revealed that the blue coloration was
clearly detectable in the pollen grains within the anthers at
stages 12 and 13, but not at stage 11 (Figure 3b-d). Further
examination showed that GUS activity was only expressed
in matured pollen grains, but not in tetrad or unicellular
microspores (Figure 3e-g). Although the blue coloration in
the pollen grains became lighter after pollination, possibly
caused by the exit of cytoplasm, strong GUS staining
occurred in the pollen tubes as they extended along the
papillae cells toward the style (Figure 3h). These results
indicate that the blue coloration observed in the pollinated
stigma came from pollen tubes, not the papillae cells.
Mutations in HIT1
affect pollen tube elongation
To examine if mutation of the HIT1 gene can result
in abnormal pollen tube growth, pollen germination
experiments were performed in vitro. Thirty pollen
grains from each of three flowers per plant were randomly
selected for observation. After 12 h of incubation, the
length of each pollen tube was measured. As shown in
Figure 4, most of the wild-type pollen tubes exceed 300
£gm in length, resulting in a single peak in the distribution
curve. For the hit1-1 mutant, none of the pollen tubes
exceeded 350 £gm. Their lengths were mainly between
50 £gm and 250 £gm, making a central plateau in the
distribution curve. For the HIT1/hit1-2 heterozygous
plants, roughly half of the pollen tubes were shorter
than 50 £gm and half were longer than 300 £gm, creating
two peaks at the opposite sides of the distribution curve.
These peaks may correspond to the hit1-2 and the HIT1
Figure 2. GUS assay of transgenic Arabidopsis plants harboring
HIT1 promoter-driven GUS reporter gene. (a) GUS staining
on a 10-day-old plantlet; (b) GUS staining on an inflorescence.
Blue signals are observed in the anthers of late flowers; (c) A
series of five flower buds on an inflorescence. The detached
flower buds were stained with X-Gluc solution, then the sepals
and petals were removed for photographic documentation.
pg_0005
WANG et al. ¡X A tethering protein homolog in male gametophyte
29
allele, respectively, in the haploid pollen grains (Figure 4).
Similar results were found when the pollen grains from
HIT1/hit1-3 heterozygous plants were examined (data not
shown). Together, these data indicate that HIT1 is crucial
for pollen tube growth. Disruption of HIT1 by T-DNA
insertion restricts pollen tube elongation while hit1-1 is a
partially functional allele resulting in a reduction of pollen
tube length.
DISCUSSION
Vesicle tethering factors are one of the major
components conferring the specificity of membrane
fusion, possibly at the earliest stage, in the course of
vesicle trafficking. Tethering factors can be large multi-
subunit complexes, and at least seven complexes have
been proposed to play roles in vesicle tethering at distinct
trafficking steps (Whyte and Munro, 2002). To date,
yeast and animal systems have provided the basis of our
understanding of vesicle tethering. Many homologs of
these tethering factors were identified in plants through
genomic analysis, but their biological roles remain
unknown (Jurgens and Geldner, 2002; Elias et al., 2003;
Figure 3. Microscopic observation of GUS activity in transgenic Arabidopsis plants harboring HIT1 promoter-driven GUS reporter
gene. (a) The root apex region from a 10-day-old plantlet; (b, c, d) Anthers from flowers at floral stages 11 (b); 12 (c), and 13 (d);
(e) Tetrads; (f) Uninucleate microspore; (g) Mature pollen grains; (h) The stigmatic region of a self-pollinated transgenic plant,
showing blue-colored pollen tubes along papillae cells. The pollen grains may become detached from the pollen tubes during sample
preparation. Some pollen tubes and papillae cells are out of focus. pt, pollen tube. Scare bars: (a, b, c, d) 50 £gm; (e, f, g, h) 25 £gm.
Figure 4. The distribution of pollen tube lengths in vitro. Three
flowers from each plant were picked, and 30 pollen grains from
each flower were randomly chosen for observation for a total
of 90 pollen grains per plant. Three plants from each line were
used to calculate the standard deviations of the mean percent of
pollen tubes at each length for each genotype using SigmaPlot
2000 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
pg_0006
30
Botanical Studies, Vol. 49, 2008
Latijnhouwers et al., 2005). Only very recently, functional
characterizations of the plant genes AtSEC8 and POK by
mutant analysis have been reported (Lobstein et al., 2004;
Cole et al., 2005). Each of these genes, however, encodes
a putative subunit of different tethering complexes. HIT1
and POK, on the other hand, encode putative subunits of
the same tethering complex. Therefore, the hit1 mutants
are valuable for both functional studies and for providing
a new approach to dissecting the multifarious vesicle
tethering in plants.
Male gametophyte development occurs through a series
of sequential steps, and disrupting any of these steps can
result in male-specific transmission defects. Whether HIT1
would affect pollen development at earlier developmental
events, such as mitotic cytokinesis, is uncertain. However,
because the HIT1 promoter-GUS fusion activity appeared
in the mature pollen grains and the growing pollen tubes, it
was thought that one function of the HIT1 was to facilitate
the initiation and maintenance of the polarized growth of
pollen tubes.
The fact that HIT1 is a homolog of known
tethering factors provided additional support for this idea.
The reduction in pollen tube length produced by pollen
from hit1-1 plants also lends credence to this hypothesis.
Additionally, male gametophytes with reduced pollen tube
length like those harboring hit1-1 allele can theoretically
cause segregation distortion, due to competition with wild-
type gametophytes. In fact, the analysis of F2 progeny
from a cross between the wild type and a hit1-1 mutant
revealed a 4:1 ratio of wild-type to mutant phenotype,
instead of the standard 3:1 ratio (Wu et al., 2000).
In plants, the elongation of root hair also employs a tip
growth mechanism. Since hit1-2 and hit1-3 can only be
isolated as hemizygous lines, it is not possible to study
the effects of these two T-DNA insertion alleles on root
hair development. However, the hit1-1 mutant did exhibit
reduced root hair length (Wang and Wu, unpublished
data), suggesting that HIT1 may have a general role in
polar growth.
In yeast, Vps51p, Vps52p, Vps53p, and Vps54p
constitute the newly discovered tetrameric GARP tethering
complex (Conibear and Stevens, 2000; Siniossoglou
and Pelham, 2001; Conibear et al., 2003). In addition
to HIT1, which is homologous to Vps53p, Arabidopsis
genes POK and AtVps54 (At1g71270 and At4g19490,
respectively) were recently identified to encode potential
homologs of yeast Vps52p and Vps54p (Lobstein et al.,
2004; Latijnhouwers et al., 2005). Nevertheless, HIT1
and POK promoter-driven GUS staining showed different
expression patterns in the reproductive tissues. While
HIT1 expression was specifically in the haploid male
gametophyte, the expression of POK can be sporophytic
and female oriented, as blue staining was also observed
in ovules (Lobstein et al., 2004). The differences in
GUS expression between the HIT1 and POK constructs
may have due to the fact that the GUS gene in the POK
study was fused with the first ten exons of the POK, and
the GUS gene for HIT1 in the present study was placed
directly downstream of the HIT1 5¡¦ untranslated region.
Alternatively, a gene encoding a homolog of Vps51p has
not been detected in Arabidopsis, and considering the
complexity in cellular organization and secretory proteins
in plants, it has been proposed that the vesicle-trafficking
machinery may have evolved independently in plants
(Jurgens and Geldner, 2002).
The hit1-1 mutant was originally identified by its
susceptibility to heat and osmotic stress (Wu et al.,
2000). This susceptibility made it clear that HIT1 is not
only important in the male gametophyte, but also in
somatic cells. Vesicle trafficking has been proposed to
be essential in plant responses to stress (Levine, 2002).
This process is required for the removal of damaged
membranes and the delivery of the new ones to their target
sites. Indeed, if HIT1 is involved in vesicle tethering
events, the partially functional hit1-1 allele would lead
to inefficient vesicle trafficking, explaining the observed
stress sensitive phenotypes in addition to reduced pollen
tube length. Furthermore, a low level expression of
HIT1 was detected in other vegetative tissues by RNA
gel blot and reverse transcription-PCR (Lobstein et al.,
2004; Lee et al., 2006). Microarray analysis on the other
hand showed that the expression of HIT1 is low and lacks
tissue specificity (Schmid et al., 2005). Although the
data in this report shows that the HIT1 promoter-driven
GUS activity was primarily detected in the root of young
plantlets, a trace amount of GUS activity was detected
in soil-grown rosette leaves (Wang and Wu, unpublished
data). The difference in the expression pattern may be
because of different experimental methods. Taken as a
whole, a single tethering protein homolog may govern
many important cellular events, in both gametophytic and
sporophytic cells, affecting plant growth in different ways
at various developmental stages. Further characterization
and analyses of the hit1 mutants and the function of HIT1
should provide new insights into the importance and the
diverse roles of tethering factors in plants.
Acknowledgement. This work was supported by
National Science Council (Taiwan) through Grant NSC
95-2311-B-008-007-MY2 (S.-J. Wu).
LITERATURE CITED
Clough, S.J. and A.F. Bent. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method
for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis
thaliana. Plant J. 16: 735-743.
Cole, R.A., L. Synek, V. Zarsky, and J.E. Fowler. 2005. SEC8,
a subunit of the putative Arabidopsis exocyst complex,
facilitates pollen germination and competitive pollen tube
growth. Plant Physiol. 138: 2005-2018.
Conibear, E. and T.H. Stevens . 2000. Vps52p, Vps53p, and
Vps54p form a novel multisubunit complex required for
protein sorting at the yeast late Golgi. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:
305-323.
pg_0007
WANG et al. ¡X A tethering protein homolog in male gametophyte
31
Conibear, E ., J .N. Cleck, and T.H. S tevens. 2003. Vps51p
m ediate s the ass ocia tion of the GARP (Vps 52/53/54)
complex with the late Golgi t-SNARE Tlg1p. Mol. Biol.
Cell 14: 1610-1623.
Derksen, J., T. Rutten, I.K. Lichtscheidl, A.H.N. Dewin, E.S .
Pierson, and G. Rongen. 1995. Quantitative analysis of
the dis tri bution of organelle s in tobacco pollen tubes :
implications for exocytosis and endocytosis. Protoplasma
188: 267-276.
Edlund, A.F., R. S wanson, and D. Preuss. 2004. Pollen and
s tigma s tructure and function: the role of divers ity in
pollination. Plant Cell 16: S84-S97.
Elias, M., E. Drdova, D. Ziak, B. Bavlnka, M. Hala, F.
Cvrckova, H. Soukupova, and V. Zarsky. 2003. The exocyst
complex in plants. Cell Biol. Int. 27: 199-201.
Fan, L.M., Y.F. Wang, H. Wang, and W.H. Wu. 2001. In vitro
Arabidopsis pollen germination and characterization of
the inward potassium currents in Arabidopsis pollen grain
protoplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1603-1614.
Ferguson, C., T.T. Teeri, M. Siika-aho, S.M. Read, and A. Bacic.
1998. Location of cellulose and callose in pollen tubes and
grains of Nicotiana tabacum. Planta 206: 452-460.
F ranklin-Tong, V.E. 1999. Signaling and the modulation of
pollen tube growth. Plant Cell 11: 727-738.
Hepler, P.K., L. Vidali, and A.Y. Cheung. 2001. Polarized cell
growth in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17:
159-187.
Johnson-Brousseau, S.A. and S. McCormick. 2004. A
c om pe nd iu m of m et ho ds u se fu l for c ha ra ct er iz i ng
Arabidopsis pollen mutants and gametophytically-expressed
genes. Plant J. 39: 761-775.
Jurgens, G. and N. Geldner. 2002. Protein secretion in plants:
from the trans-Golgi network to the outer space. Traffic 3:
605-613.
Latijnhouwers, M., C. Hawes, and C. Carvalho. 2005. Holding it
all together. Candidate proteins for the plant golgi matrix.
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8: 1-8.
Lee, C.F., H.Y. Pu, L.C. Wang, R.J. Sayler, C.H. Yeh, and S.J.
Wu. 2006. Mutation in a homolog of yeast Vps53p accounts
for the hea t and os motic hypers ensitive phenotypes in
Arabidopsis hit1-1 mutant. Planta 224: 330-338.
Levine, A. 2002. Regulation of stress responses by intracellular
vesicle trafficking. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 40: 531-535.
L i, H., Y. Lin, R.M. Heath, M.X. Zhu, and Z. Yang. 1999.
Control of pollen tube tip growth by a Rop GTPase-
dependent pathway that le ads to tip-localized calc ium
influx. Plant Cell 11: 1731-1742.
Lobstein, E., A. Guyon, M. Ferault, D. Twell, G. Pelletier, and
S. Bonhomme. 2004. The putative Arabidopsis homolog of
yeast vps52p is required for pollen tube elongation, localizes
to Golgi, and might be involved in vesicle trafficking. Plant
Physiol. 135: 1480-1490.
Parton, R.M., S. Fisher-Parton, M.K. Watahiki, and A.J.
T r ew a va s . 20 01 . Dy n a m i c s o f t he a pi c a l v e s i c l e
accumulation and the rate of growth are related in individual
pollen tubes. J. Cell Sci. 144: 2685-2695.
Procissi, A., A. Guyon, E.S. Pierson, A. Giritch, B. Knuiman,
O, Grandjean, C. Tonelli, J. Derksen, G. Pelletier, and S.
Bonhomme. 2003. KINKY POLLEN encodes a S ABRE-
like protien required for tip growth in Ar abidopsis and
conserved among eukaryotes. Plant J. 36: 894-904.
Ross o, M.G., Y. L i, N. St riz hov, B. Reis s, K. Dekker, and
B. Weis sha ar. 2003. An Ar abidopsi s thal iana T-DNA
mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence
tag-based reverse genetics. Plant Mol. Biol. 53: 247-259.
Sanders, P.M., A.Q. Bui, K. Weterings, K.N. McIntire, Y.C. Hsu,
P.Y. Lee, M.T. Truong, T.P. Beals, and R.B. Goldberg. 1999.
Anther developmental defects in Arabidopsis thaliana
male-sterile mutants. Sex. Plant Reprod. 11: 297-322.
Schmid, M., T.S. Davis on, S .R. Henz, U.J. Pape, M. Demar,
M. Vingron, B. Scholkoph, D. Weigel, and J.U. Lohmann.
2005. A gene express ion map of Arabidopsis thal iana
development. Nature Genet. 37: 501-506.
Siniossoglou, S. and H.R. Pelham. 2001. An effector of Ypt6p
binds the S NARE Tlg1p and mediates s elective fus ion
of ves icl es wit h l ate Golgi m embra nes. EMBO J . 20:
5991-5998.
Sterling, J.D., H.F. Quigley, A. Orellana, and D. Mohnen. 2001.
The catalytic site of the pectin biosynthetic enzyme £\-1,4-
galacturonosyltransferase is located in the lumen of the
Golgi. Plant Physiol. 127: 360-371.
Smyth, D.R., J.L. Bowman, and E.M. Meyerowitz. 1990. Early
flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2: 755-767.
Sztul, E. and V. Lupashin. 2006. Role of tethering factors in
secretory membrane traffic. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
290: C11-C26.
Whyte, J.R. and S. Munro. 2002. Vesicle tethering complexes in
membrane traffic. J. Cell Sci. 115: 2627-2637.
Wu, S.J., R.D. Locy, J.J. Shaw, J.H. Cherry, and N.K. Singh.
2000. Mutantion in Arabidopsis HIT1 l ocus ca us ing
heat and osmotic hypersensitivity. J . P lant Physiol. 157:
543-547.
pg_0008
32
Botanical Studies, Vol. 49, 2008