Botanical Studies (2009) 50: 217-227.
*
Corresponding author: E-mail: esclove@ntu.edu.tw;
+886-2-33664640; +886-2-23697658.
INTRODUCTION
Invasive species have been considered as major threats
to the ecosystems of national parks by altering the soil
nutrients, taking over territories, forming monocultures,
changing species compositions, etc (Rogers and
Leathwick, 1996; Wuerthner, 1996; Jesson et al., 2000;
Evans et al., 2001; Wolf et al., 2004). The way in which
invasive species get into these native habitats are rarely
discussed (Gelbard and Harrison, 2005; Foxcroft et al.,
2007, 2008). Human activity may be to blame (Larson
et al., 2001). We believe that the recreation function
of national parks brings people to appreciate natural
Patterns of plant invasions in the preserves and
recreation areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
Shan-Huah WU
1
, J. K. TSAI
2
, H. T. SUN
2
, C. F.
CHEN
2
, and Chyi-Rong
CHIOU
3,
*
1
Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd., Taipei 115 Taiwan
2
Department Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, 88 Sec. 4, Ting-Chow Rd., Taipei 116, Taiwan
3
Department Forestry, National Taiwan University, 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan
(Received June 25, 2008; Accepted November 27, 2008)
ABSTRACT.
Nature preserves in the national parks are usually adjacent to the recreation areas, where
most of the tourists visit. Although permits are required and only few small trials are available to enter
the preserves, species naturalized in the neighboring recreation areas may hitchhike across the borders. To
estimate the differences of plant invasions in neighboring preserves and recreation areas experiencing different
intensity of anthropogenic activities, we employed Wuling district (alt. 1,800-3,860 m), Shei-Pa National Park
in Taiwan as our study site. Our hypotheses were: (1) the recreation areas harbor more naturalized species,
and plant invasion patterns are different in these areas under various land management strategies; (2) species
inhabiting the preserves could be found in the recreation areas as well; (3) naturalized species of temperate
origins are dominant due to the temperate weather in the mountains. Total of 230 quadrats in one meter square
quadrats were randomly selected along the roads and trails in both areas. Naturalized species, relative cover,
elevation, and naturalness degree were obtained and analyzed. The results showed that the naturalized species
in both areas were herbaceous, originating from tropical and temperate Americas and Europe. Naturalized
floras of these two areas were presented by analogous dominant families, Asteraceae and Poaceae, and
dominant species, Bromus catharticus and Trifolium repens. However, the number and coverage of naturalized
species, £\ diversity, elevation, and naturalness degree, suggested different patterns of plant invasions of these
two areas. Recreation areas accommodated significantly more naturalized species and higher coverage, and
elevation was responsible for distinct patterns of plant invasions. Both of the preserves and recreation areas
in Wuling provided suitable habitats for similar naturalized floras; however, relatively more species harbored
by the later implied a source and sink relationships between these two areas. Furthermore, environmental
factors that change with the elevation, such as temperature, topography, and native vegetation, may contribute
to different patterns of plant invasions presented by preserves and the recreation areas in the subtropical
mountains.
Keywords: National park; Naturalized species; Nature preserve; Plant invasions; Recreation area; Shei-Pa
National Park.
wonders, but also increases chances of possible invasions,
since land use intensity has been contributive to plant
invasions in both recreation and protected areas of national
parks (Mckinney, 2002; Foxcroft et al., 2007). Although
the disturbance caused by visitors and transportation
infrastructures is mostly concentrated in the designated
recreation areas, these areas may serve as a base for
invaders to expand their territories into adjacent protected
areas, nature preserves, and cause problems (Wein et al.,
1992). Despite the endeavors scientists have devoted to
estimating plant invasions in national parks (Schwarz
and Wein, 1997; Jesson et al., 2000; Rowlands and Brian,
2001; Pauchard et al., 2003; Foxcroft et al., 2007, 2008),
patterns of plant invasions in neighboring recreation and
protected areas with different anthropogenic disturbances
are seldom reported.
ECOLOGY
pg_0002
218
Botanical Studies, Vol. 50, 2009
According to Py.ek et al. (2004), many environmental
and biological barriers have to be conquered for an
introduced species to invade new territories successfully.
Environmental factors, such as disturbance, usually
provide more opportunities for successful invasions
(Ross et al., 2002; Hendrickson et al., 2005; Alston and
Richardson, 2006). However, disturbance could be an
environmental barrier for introduced species to invade
places with low intensity of anthropogenic activities
or pressures of natural disturbances (Kang et al., 2007;
Paiaro et al., 2007; Theoharides and Dukes, 2007). On
the other hand, the invaders¡¦ successful establishment
and spreading may depend upon other factors as well,
such as biological traits and climates (Wu et al., 2004b;
Thuiller et al., 2006; Wilson et al., 2007). We assumed
that alien species successfully establishing in native
habitats might be considered as respective competitors and
deserve attentions. Besides, patterns of plant invasions
in the preserves might generate better understanding of
invasiveness.
The compositions of naturalized flora and dominant
naturalized species seemed to vary along the elevation
gradients in the central mountains in Taiwan (Wu et al.,
unpublished). Our previous study (Wu et al., 2004b)
suggested that dominant tropical American species in the
naturalized flora of Taiwan might be a result of similar
tropical and subtropical climates. Besides, noticeable
amount of temperate species from Europe might find
suitable habitats in the mountains where national parks and
natural reserves are located. This is worrisome since these
montane preserves with temperate to alpine climates are
usually immediately adjacent to the recreation areas, and
impacts of invasive species in natural reserves have been
shown in the boreal ecosystems (Pauchard et al., 2003;
Rose and Hermanutz, 2004). However, basic information
about plant invasions in these areas is anecdotal.
Shei-Pa National Park is a unique and popular
national park with 51 mountain peaks over 3,000 meters
in elevation located in northern Taiwan. The undulated
topography changing from about 1,000 to 3,886 meters,
together with climate variations, result in the diversified
habitats of Shei-Pa National Park harboring 61 endemic
and rare flora, such as Taiwan Sassafras (Sassafras
randaiense), Devol¡¦s Balsamine (Impatiens devolii),
Dumasia miaoliensis, Epilobium nankotaizanens, and
fauna, like Formosan Black Bear (Selenarctos tibetanus
formosanus), Formosan Macaque (Macaca cyclopsis
Swinhoe), Formosan Land-locked Salmon (Oncorhynchus
masou formosanus), Mikado Pheasant (Syrmaticus
mikado),and Swinhoe¡¦s Blue Pheasant (Lophura swinhoii)
(Wang, 1995). Despite its remote location and frequent
landslides on the main entrance ways, the major district of
Shei-Pa National Park, Wuling, is one of the most popular
destinations to the public and the most developed area
compared to other districts of this national park. A five star
resort, few hotels, vegetable farms, fruit and tea plantations
are the dominant scenes of this region. These crop fields
and plantations are directly adjacent to the preserves
and right on the side of Cijiawan Creek, the home of
endangered landlocked salmon, endemic Oncorhynchus
masou formosanum (Tseng, 1999). There is no restriction
for visitors to enter the recreation area, while permits are
required for accessing the neighboring preserves. The trail
and cabin system is well established in Wuling district,
which leads backpackers to the mountain peaks deep
inside the preserves from the recreation areas, in which the
ranger stations situated. In summer, the mountaineering
season, the cabins are usually full of hundreds of people
during holidays and long weekends. We were concerned
that invasive species may hitchhike into the roadless nature
preserves along the trails by mountain hikers (Harrison et
al., 2002).
Abandoned fields are becoming common recently in
the recreation areas in Wuling, and naturalized species
are usually seen and dominant in these fields. Following
the act of retreating farms and fruit plantations out of the
national park in recent years, many abandoned farms have
been scattering in the recreation areas of Wuling. Although
some of these fields are still under certain levels of
farming, the grounds are usually occupied by naturalized
species and persistent crops. Besides, the groundcover
of less managed fruit plantations is usually a mixture of
naturalized and native herbaceous species. Landslides and
disturbances of different intensities caused by frequent
visiting typhoons may also exacerbate plant invasions
since naturalized species usually favor disturbed areas
and they may get into the neighboring preserves by edge
effects (Lu and Keping, 2006).
The main purpose of our study was to approach and
compare the patterns of plant invasions in both preserves
and recreation areas, which represented two different
intensities of land management and use, in the Wuling
district of the Shei-Pa National Park. We hypothesized that
(1) the recreation areas should harbor more naturalized
flora, and plant invasion patterns are different in these
areas under various land management strategies; (2)
species inhabiting the preserves could be found in
the recreation areas as well; (3) naturalized species of
temperate origins are dominant due to the temperate
weather in the mountains. The field investigation was
conducted in summer, 2006.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site
We chose Wuling district of Shei-Pa National Park
(24¢X23¡¦15.6" N latitude, 121¢X18¡¦08.0" E longitude) (Figure
1) for this study, since it is the only district with accessible
nature preserves and recreation areas experiencing
different levels of anthropogenic activities. Shei-Pa
National Park is located in northern Taiwan, and Wuling
is in the east of this national park with conservation
areas, special scenic areas, general protected areas, and
recreation areas. We grouped these four types of areas into
pg_0003
WU et al. ¡X Plant invasions in the areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
219
Figure 1. Location and topography of the study site, Wuling,
Shei-Pa National Park, Taiwan (24¢X23¡¦15.6" N latit ude, 121¢X
18¡¦08.0" E longitude).
two major categories, recreation areas (general protected
and recreation areas) and preserves (conservation and
special scenic areas) for our study based on their land
management types.
The recreation areas are relatively smaller than adjacent
preserves possess major attractions and host majority of
the visitors. Elevations the preserves are approximately
1,800 to 3,850 meters. Annual average temperature is
about 16¢XC and the annual average precipitation is about
2,200 mm (Wang, 1995; Ou et al., 2006). The vegetations
of the recreation areas are gardens, abandoned fields,
vegetable farms, tea plantations, temperate cloud forests
(Quercus forests and Tsuga-Picea forests), and riparian.
The preserves are mainly covered by temperate cloud
forests, conifer forests, alpine grasslands, and Abies
woodlands (Hsieh et al., 1997). The alpine grassland, the
dominant vegetation over 3,000 meters in elevation, is
composed of very short bamboo, Yushania niitakayamensis
(Hayata) Keng f. (Wang, 1995).
The transportation system in the recreation area is
simply one county road together with a few outlets. Only
hiking trails lead to the preserves. The entrances of these
hiking trails to the preserves, however, are usually at the
ends of the outlets extending from the recreation areas.
No restriction is applied for entering the recreation areas,
while passes are required to approach the preserves.
Materials
To access the patterns of plant invasions, naturalized
species were utilized to present potential invaders, since
naturalization is the fundamental step for an introduced
species to invade new territories (Py.ek et al., 2004). Wu
et al. (2004a) was employed for identifying naturalized
species. Since the list was published a few years before
the study, relevant journal publications were also used as
supplementary.
Methods
Random sampling was implemented in this study for
plot selection. Approximately ten quadrates of 1 ¡Ñ 1 square
meter were randomly selected in every kilometer along the
roads and trails in both the recreation areas and preserves.
The distances of the quadrats to the roads ranged from one
to ten meters according to random number table. For each
quadrat, species and relative coverage (%) of naturalized
species were recorded. Furthermore, environmental
factors, including degree of naturalness, vegetation
type, and elevation were collected. Naturalness degree
simply classifies habitats into six levels according to the
vegetation types and anthropogenic utilizations: level
five represents native forests, four for native grasslands,
three for timber plantations, two for croplands and fruit
plantations, one for bare grounds, and zero indicates
constructions and infrastructure (Huang et al., 1999).
Data obtained in the field were complied and analyzed
for preservers (P) and recreation areas (R) for comparisons.
Simple statistics was performed to summarize basic
numerical data, such as numbers of family, genus, and
species. Additionally, abundance was estimated by the
total relative coverage (%) of each naturalized species,
and relative frequency was calculated by the percentage of
total plots divided by present plots. IVI (Importance value
index) values of naturalized species were estimated by half
of the sum of relative abundance and relative frequency.
Species with the highest abundance and IVI value were
both considered as the dominant species. As for the
origins, life forms and habit of most naturalized species,
we referred to Wu et al. (2004a).
Total coverage of naturalized species (SUM), number
of naturalized species (N), and six £\ diversity indices,
including Shannon-Wiener index (H¡¦), Simpson (£f),
evenness (E5) (Ludwig and Reynolds, 1988), species
richness (N1) and Berger-Parker dominance (BP Index)
(May, 1975) of each plot with naturalized species in
protected and recreation areas were calculated by SDR
(Species Diversity and Richness 4.1.2, 2006). A total of
230 plots were included, and obtained field data were
separated into two sets: one set for preserves; the other for
recreation areas, for further analysis. Multivariate Analysis
(MANOVA) was performed, and P<0.05 was used to
pg_0004
220
Botanical Studies, Vol. 50, 2009
determine the significance in all tests. Factor analysis (FA)
was also utilized to visualize and group the patterns of the
indices. Regression tree analysis was employed to access
the most significant variables separating patterns of plant
invasions in protected and recreation areas. Proportion of
reduction error (PRE) value, similar to R
2
in regression,
was used to determine the amount of variation explained
by the independent variable (Hansen et al., 1996). Factor
Analysis (FA), Multivariate Analysis (MANOVA), and
regression tree analysis performed by SYSTAT (version
11.0, Systat software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA. 2004).
RESULTS
The biological composition and biodiversity indices
differed between the preserves and recreation areas (Table
1). About 40% of the plots in the preserves did not have
any naturalized species, while around 10% of the plots in
the recreation areas were free of naturalized species. Five
biodiversity indices of these two areas were significantly
different, and two environmental factors, such as elevation
and naturalness degree, also showed significant difference
for the preserves and recreation areas (Table 1). All of the
Table 1. Numerical summary of plots, species composition, life forms, coverage (%), and £\ diversity indices of protected
and recreation areas. Summary statistics (mean with standard error in parentheses) by species number, coverage (%), £\
diversity indices, and environmental factors are included.
Protected areas
Recreation areas
Plot number
107
163
Plot with naturalized plant
83
147
Plot without naturalized plant
24
16
Family number
10
12
Genus number
16
25
Species number
21
32
Vine
0
1
Herbaceous
19
29
Shrubs
2
2
Trees
0
0
Dominant species
Bromus catharticus
Bromus catharticus
Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens
Dominant family
Asteraceae
Asteraceae
Dominant genus
Bidens
Bidens
Species number/plot
1.55 (0.11)
2.43 (0.09)****
Coverage sum (%)
1556.5 (15.565 m
2
)
5366 (53.66 m
2
)****
Maximum cover (%)
15.92 (2.80)
27.95 (2.10)****
Mean cover/plot (%)
18.76 (3.38)
36.50 (2.54)
Shannon-Weiner Index (H¡¦)
0.25 (0.04)
0.53 (0.03)****
Simpson Index (£f)
1.40 (0.09)
1.80 (0.06)***
Evenness (E5)
0.95 (0.03)
0.81 (0.02)****
Richness (N1)
1.37 (0.07)
1.84 (0.06)****
Berger-Parker dominance Index
0.87 (0.02)
0.76 (0.02)****
Elevation (m)
2148.22 (30.00)
1848.72 (22.54)****
Naturalness degree
3.02 (0.14)
4.39 (0.11)****
MANOVA: n = 270. Means with asterisks are significant from each other of the value of protected and recreation areas.
***: P<0.001; ****: P < 0.0001.
pg_0005
WU et al. ¡X Plant invasions in the areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
221
the patterns of plant invasions of preserves and recreation
areas in (PRE = 0.72) (Figure 3B).
DISCUSSION
Plant invasions seem to be moderate in the Wuling
district. Compared to the 1,135 native species in this
region (Hsu, 1984), naturalized species only represented a
very small portion, approximate 4% of the total flora, half
of that of the whole island (about 8% of the Taiwan flora
is naturalized (Wu et al., 2004a). The difference might be
the results of geographical isolation or the climates of this
district. Situated in the central ridge of Taiwan, the only
one county road leading to this region is usually damaged
by frequent typhoons in summer. Besides, nearest city
connected by this only one wavy road is in about three-
hour driving distance. On the other hand, snows falling
on the mountains and harsh freezing winter in this region
might screen out the majority of naturalized species, which
dominant in the lowlands, from the tropics. Although the
proportion presented by naturalized species was small, it
naturalized species were herbaceous and shrub in both
areas; no naturalized trees were found (Table 1).
In terms of naturalized flora, the recreation areas tended
to harbor more families, genera, and species. However,
the dominant species Trifolium repen L. and Bromus
catharticus, followed by Conyza sumatranesis, and Bidens
pilosa var. pilosa were the same for these two types of
habitats (Table 2). The dominant family was Asteraceae
followed by Poaceae and Fabaceae for both areas (Figure
2A). Most of the naturalized species in both preserves and
recreation areas originating from tropical and temperate
regions, especially the Americas and Europe (Figure 2B).
The first two factors of factor analysis explained about
71% of the total variance (Figure 3A). Indices related to
the numbers of naturalized species, such as H¡¦ and £f, were
on the positive end of the first factor, while BP index was
on the opposite end. For factor two, elevation and total
coverage of the naturalized species were on the positive
end while naturalness degree and evenness (E5) were
on the other side. Regression tree analysis showed that
elevation was the most significant variable distinguishing
Table 2. Top ten dominant species of protected and recreation areas. Plant taxa are in the order of IVI values from high to
low. The family species belongs is indicated in parentheses. Both of the species with the highest IVI and relative cover (%)
are considered as dominant species with bolded numbers of IVI and relative cover (%).
Species (Family)
IVI
Relative cover (%)
Recreation areas
Bromus catharticus Vahl. (Poaceae)
23.42
12.26
Trifolium repens L. (Fabaceae)
20.90
14.92
Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) Walker (Asteraceae)
10.72
4.39
Bidens pilosa L. var. radiata Sch. (Asteraceae)
9.41
4.11
Trifolium pratense L. (Fabaceae)
3.06
2.03
Veronica persica Poir. (Scrophulariaceae)
2.98
2.41
Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S. Moore (Asteraceae)
1.83
0.80
Lolium multiflorum Lam. (Poaceae)
1.77
1.08
Momordica charantia L. var. abbreviata Ser. (Cucurbitaceae)
1.75
1.41
Lepidium virginicum L. (Brassicaceae)
1.61
1.15
Protected areas
Bromus catharticus Vahl. (Poaceae)
11.43
5.87
Trifolium repens L. (Fabaceae)
10.43
8.78
Lolium multiflorum Lam. (Poaceae)
6.75
4.05
Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) Walker (Asteraceae)
3.25
1.15
Bidens pilosa L. var. minor (Blume) Sherff (Asteraceae)
2.27
0.92
Bidens pilosa L. var. radiata Sch. (Asteraceae)
2.23
1.03
Crassocephalum crepidioides (Benth.) S. Moore (Asteraceae)
1.67
0.32
Trifolium dubium Sibth. (Fabaceae)
1.33
0.73
Ageratum conyzoides L. (Asteraceae)
1.11
0.81
Geranium carolinianum L. (Geraniaceae)
0.64
0.19
pg_0006
222
Botanical Studies, Vol. 50, 2009
is very difficult to testify whether Taiwan is more resistant
to plant invasion as Wu et al. assumed without supporting
field data (Wu et al., 2004b; Daehler, 2006).
The same dominant family, genera, and species shared
by preserves and recreation areas may be explained by
neighboring and stepping stone effects. The number of
naturalized species was significantly less in the preserves
than in the recreation areas (Table 1), nevertheless, all
the naturalized species present in the preserves were in
the flora of recreation areas. This, furthermore, supported
our idea that the naturalized flora of the protected areas is
a fraction of the naturalized flora in the recreation areas.
Besides, this result also implied that naturalized species
may come from the neighboring recreation areas where
tourists stop by before visiting the preserves. These shared
species should have broader niche breadth (Richards et al.,
2006).
The dominant species, Trifolium repens, and Bromus
catharticus Vahl (Table 2), of both areas might find the
temperate habitats in the central mountains of Taiwan
similar to their home ranges in Europe and temperate
South America (Richardson and Thuiller, 2007). Although
the nitrogen fixing function of T. repens may alter soil
nutrient gradients (Warren, 2000; Evans et al., 2001), its
impacts were restricted since it was currently only present
in places located in relatively developed areas. On the
contrary, B. catharticus, the only species surviving in
alpine vegetations up to 3,800 meters in elevation, has
Figure 2. A, Dom inant families of the naturalized flora in the protected areas and recreation areas; B, Origins of naturalized
species in the protected (P) and recreation areas (R).
Figure 3. A, Factor a nalysis for numbe r of naturalized species, total cover of naturalized species, the biodiversity indices,
elevation, and naturalness degree of the protected and recreation areas. Percent of total variance explained is 42% for factor (1),
29% for factor (2), and 15% for factor (3); B, Regression tree for number of naturalized species, total cover of nat uralized spe-
cies, the biodiversity indices, elevation, and nat uralness degree across the a rea types (protected and recreation areas), includ-
ing means, standard deviation (SD) and sample size (n) for each break. PR a reas indicated protected and recreation areas. PRE
(0.72) indicates the proportion of reduction in error.
pg_0007
WU et al. ¡X Plant invasions in the areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
223
adapted very well to harsh montane environments. Bromus
catharticus has been shown to possess various advantages
in growing and population maintaining, such as high
phenotypic plasticity to various environments, large seed
production, seed dormancy, low temperate tolerance,
and high genetic variation (Mauromicale and Cavallaro,
1996; Wolff et al., 1996; Pistorale et al., 1999; Wolff et al.,
2001; Aulicino and Arturi, 2002). Beside the respectful
distributions in alpine habitats of B. catharticus, it often
formed monoculture and occupies most of the abandoned
fields in the recreation areas as well. The distribution
o f B. catharticus in the preserves was, nevertheless,
scattered and not continuous. More specifically, it
appeared at almost every stop and cabin on the hiking
trails. However, not a single individual was found in the
short bamboo (Yushania niitakayamensis) grasslands. We
suggested that the bamboo grasslands may function as a
barrier (Perelman et al., 2003) for plant invasions since
they did not accommodate any other naturalized species,
either. Although the distribution and dominance of B.
catharticus seemed to be threatening, we know nothing
about this species unfortunately. It is very worrisome that
B. catharticus may continue to spread and alter the alpine
ecosystems in the future, because their flexibility and
plasticity may be induced through interactions between
local alpine environments in terms of adaptation (Mooney
and Cleland, 2001). Further studies regarding its impacts
and associations with native species are immediately
needed. Furthermore, the possible defense mechanism of
Y. niitakayamensis may generate better understanding of
biological resistance (Chou and Yang, 1982; Eyini et al.,
1989).
Compared to the naturalized flora of Taiwan, Wuling
accommodated relatively more temperate species, although
species originating from the tropics were still presented
at certain proportions (Figure 2B). This supported our
expectation that the mountain areas in Taiwan may harbor
relatively more temperate species due to similar climates
(Pino et al., 2005). Tropical species, such as Conyza
sumatrensis and Bidens pilosa L. var. minor (Blume)
Sherff. still deserve further attentions, since they also
thrived in both preserves and recreation areas. Although
warm and humid weather in summer in this area may
provide suitable habitats, freezing temperate and relatively
harsh environments in winter still resulted in surviving
pressures to tropical species. Adaptation mechanisms of
these species deserve more attentions (Parker et al., 2003).
The composition of species and £\ diversity indices
supported our hypothesis that preserves and recreation
areas, two land management types, presented different
patterns of plant invasions (Table 1). It is not surprising
to observe more naturalized species and total cover
(SUM) of naturalized species in the recreation areas. In
addition, the differences of biodiversity indices strongly
suggested two different patterns of plant invasions in these
two areas. Significantly higher H¡¦, and £f of recreation
areas implied the composition of naturalized species was
more diversified, and species coexistence was common
according to E5 (Table 1). On the contrary, significantly
lower evenness and higher BP index of the preserves
revealed that the composition of naturalized species
was relatively uneven and dominated by few species in
the preserves. We suspected that different land uses and
native species community were relevant to these patterns.
Abandoned crop fields and plantations were the major
habitats for native and naturalized species in the recreation
areas, and chances for both species were assumed equal
when the fields were available. Therefore, relatively
even species composition could be a result of stochastic
effects. On the contrary, relatively undisturbed native plant
community formed by short bamboo and alpine species
left scattered openings for naturalized species to stand.
Only few species with formidable invasiveness could
possibly establish colonies after interacting with local
species and environments.
The environmental factors changing along the elevation
might be the causes of different invasion patterns in the
preserves and recreation areas (Figures 3A and B). The
result of factor analysis implied that elevation was the
factor correlated with total cover, since elevation was
categorized in the same factor with total cover of the
naturalized species, while the first factor of the factor
analysis was basically comprised of all the variables
relevant to species number. This pattern, furthermore, was
confirmed by the regression tree analysis (PRE = 0.72).
However, the naturalness degree, which we employed
to indicate the land cover types and probable land use
intensity, showed a reversed pattern (Table 1). It did
not seem to be reasonable that the naturalness degree
of the preserves was significantly lower than that of
the recreation areas, but we suggested that was a result
of certain areas of bare ground of gravels in the alpine
zone, which was categorized as zero. Although species
number together with a few more biodiversity indices
were the major factors that separated the plant invasion
patterns of the preserves and recreation areas. The most
important factor resulting in these different invasion
patterns was elevation (Baret et al., 2004; Becker et
al., 2005; McDougall et al., 2005). Different elevations
separated almost every subsets of the regression tree on
the recreation area side, and we were clear that the higher
the elevation, the fewer the naturalized species. This result
had nothing to do with disturbance levels alone, although
the land management and anthropogenic activities were
definitely different in the recreation areas and preserves.
However, it pointed out that the factors changing along the
elevation (similar to the latitude effect), such as climate,
dominant native species, dominant vegetation type,
temperature, disturbance, may be important in terms of
resistance (Py.ek, 1998; Cantero et al., 2003; Arevalo et
al., 2005; Gelbard and Harrison, 2005; Richardson et al.,
2005).
Our results basically supported all of our hypotheses,
although elevation, instead of nature degree, was the factor
pg_0008
224
Botanical Studies, Vol. 50, 2009
contributing to different plant invasion patterns of plant
invasions in protected and recreation areas. These different
patterns of plant invasions provided valuable information
of mountains in subtropical regions, where studies on
plant invasions are seriously rare. However, dominance
of Bromus catharticus in the preserves, especially in the
montane ecosystems, definitely requires further ecological
studies and deliberate attentions, since these habitats are
home to 25% endemic species and several species which
survived the last ice age (Hsieh et al., 1997). Furthermore,
we suggest that monitoring systems should be established
at the entrances of preserves, since few species have
managed to infect the protected areas from adjacent
recreation areas.
Acknowledgements. This study was sponsored by Shei-
Pa National Park, Construction and Planning Agency,
Ministry of the Interior, in 2006. Many thanks to park
rangers and staffs for technical support and assistance.
Furthermore, we thank Drs. Chang-Fu Hsieh and Chi-Jung
Chiu for technical supports; Wei-Chun Cheng, Yu-Ting
Chung, Chia-Long Huang, Chwen-Ling Kuo, Pei-Chun
Liao, Cheng-Fan Yang, and Sheng-Jye Wu for help with
fieldworks, and Hsuan-Jung Su for manuscript revision.
Moreover, we are very grateful for the valuable comments
and suggestions provided by two deliberate anonymous
reviewers.
LITERATURE CITED
Alston, K.P. and D.M. Richardson. 2006. The roles of habitat
feature, disturbance, and distance from putative source
populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/
wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, S outh Africa.
Biol. Conserv. 132: 183-198.
Arevalo, J.R., J.D. Delgado, R. Otto, A. Naranjo and J.M. Sa-
las M and Fernandez-Palacios. 2005. Distribution of alien
vs. native plant species in roadside communities along an
altitudinal gradient in Tenerife and Gran Canaria (Canary
Islands). Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 7: 185-202.
Aulicino, M.B. and M.J. Arturi. 2002. Phenotypic diversity in
Argentinian populations of Bromus catharticus (Poaceae).
Genetic and environmental com ponents of quantitative
traits. N. Z. J. Bot. 40: 223-234.
Baret, S., S . Maurice, T. Bourgeois and D. Stras berg. 2004.
Altitudinal variation in fertility and vegetative growth in
the invasive plant Rubus alceifolius Poiret (Rosaceae). On
Reunion island. Plant Ecol. 172: 265¡V273.
Bec ker, T., H. Di etz , R. Bi llet er, H. Busc hma nn, a nd P.J .
E dwa rds . 2005. Alti tudinal dis tri but ion of a lien plant
s p ec ies i n th e S wi ss Alps . P e rs pec t. P l ant Ec ol ogy,
Evolution and Systematics 7: 173¡V183.
Byers, J.E. and E.G. Noonburg. 2003. Scale dependent effects
of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology 84:
1428-1433.
Cantero, J.J., J. Liira, J.M. Cisnero, J. Gonzalez, C. Nunez, L.
Petryna, C. Cholaky, and M. Zobel. 2003. Species richness,
alien species and plant traits in Central Argentine mountain
grasslands. J. Veget. Sci. 14: 129-136.
Chou, C.H. and C.M. Ya ng. 1982. Allelopathic research of
subtropical vegetation in Taiwan. II. Comparative exclusion
of understory by Phyllos tachys edulis and Cryptomeria
japonica. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 1489-1508.
D¡¦Antonio, C.M. and T.L. Douley. 1995. Biological Invasions
as agents of change on the islands vers us mainland. In
P.M. Vitousek, L.L. Loope and H. Adersen (eds.), Island:
Biological Diversity and Ecosystem Function. Vol. 115.
Springer Inc, New York, pp. 103-121.
Daehler, C.C. 2006. Invasibility of tropical islands by introduced
plants: portioning the influence of isolation and propagule
pressure. Presila 78: 389-404.
Evans, R.D., R. Rimer, L. Sperry, and J. Belnap. 2001. Exotic
plant invasion alters nitrogen dynamics in an arid grassland.
Ecol. Appl. 11: 1301-1310.
Eyini, M., M. Jayakumar, and S. Pannirselvam. 1989.
Allelopathic effect of bamboo leaf extract on the seedling of
groundnut. Trop. Ecol. 30: 138-141.
Foxcroft, L.C., M. Rouget, and D.M. Richardson. 2007. Risk
assessment of riparian plant invasions into protected areas.
Conserv. Biol. 21: 412-421.
Foxcroft, L.C., D. M. Richardson, and J .R.U. Wils on. 2008.
Ornam enta l P lants as Invas ive Alie ns: Prob lem s a nd
Solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environ.
Manage. 41: 32-51.
Gelbard, J .L. and S. Harrison. 2005. Invasibility of roadless
grasslands: An experimental study of yellow starthistle.
Ecol. Appl. 15: 1570-1580.
Harrison, S., C. Hohn, and S. Ratay. 2002. Distribution of exotic
plants along roads in a peninsular nature res erve. Biol.
Invasions 4: 425-430.
Hendrickson, C., T. Bell, K. Butler, and L. Hermanutz. 2005.
Disturbance-enabled invasion of Tuss ilago farfara L. in
Gros Morne National Park, Newfoundland: management
implications. Natural Areas J. 25: 263-274.
Hsieh, C.F., W.C. Chao, C.C. Liao, K.C. Yang and T.H. Hsieh.
1997. Floristic composition of the evergreen broadleaved
forests in Taiwan. Natural History Research Special Issue 4:
1-16.
Hsu, K.S. 1994. Rare and endemic plants of Shei-Pa National
Park. Research report, Shei-Pa National Park, Construction
and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, (In
Chinese)
Huang, T.C., J.T. Wu and C.F. Hsieh. 1999. S uggestions for
evaluation criteria and report forma t of environmental
impact assessment. Department of Botany, National Taiwan
University, Taipei, Taiwan, 68 pp. (In Chinese)
Jesson, L., D. Kelly and A. Sparrow. 2000. The importance of
dis persal, disturbance, and competition for exotic plant
invasions in Arthur¡¦s Pass National Park, New Zealand. N.
Z. J. Bot. 38: 451-468.
pg_0009
WU et al. ¡X Plant invasions in the areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
225
Kang, M., J .J.H. Ciborows ki, and L.B. J ohnson. 2007. The
influence of anthropogenic disturbance and environmental
s ui tab ili ty o n th e di st rib uti on of t he n onin dige nous
Amphipod, Echinogammarus ischnus, at Laurentian Great
Lakes Coastal Margins. J. Great Lakes Res. 33: 198-210.
Larson, D.L., P.J. Anderson, and W. Newton. 2001. Alien plant
invasion in mixed-grass prairie: Effects of vegetation type
and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecol. Appl. 11: 128-141.
Levine, J.M. 2000. S pecies diversity and biological invasions:
relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:
852-854.
Loope, L.L. and D. Mueller-Dombois. 1989. Characteristics of
invaded islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In J.A.,
H.A. Mooney, F. DiCastri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger, M.
Rejmanek and M. Williamson (eds.), Biological Invasions:
A Global Perspective. Scope 37. John Wiley and Sons, New
York, 550 pp.
Lu, Z. and M. Keping. 2006. Spread of the exotic croftonweed
(Eupatorium adenophorum) across southwest China along
roads and streams. Weed Sci. 54: 1068-1072.
Ludwig, J.A. and J.F. Reynolds . 1988. Statistical ecology: a
primer on methods and computing. Wiley-Inters cience,
New York, 368 pp.
Ma uromic ale , G. and V. Ca valla ro. 1 996. E ffe cts of se ed
osmopriming on germination of three herbage grasses at
low temperatures. Seed Sci. Technol. 24: 331-338.
May, R.M . 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity.
In M.L. Cody and J .M. Diam ond (eds.), Ec ology and
Evolution of Com munities . Harvard Universi ty Press ,
Cambridge, pp. 81-120.
McDougall, K.L., J.W. Morgan, N.G. Walsh, and R.J. Williams.
2005. Plant invasions in treeless vegetation of the Australian
Alps. Perspective Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 7: 159-171.
McKinney, M.L. 2002. Influence of settlement time, human
population, park shape and age, visitation and roads on the
number of alien plant species in protected areas in the USA.
Divers. Distrib. 8: 311-318.
Moon ey, H.A. and E.E . Cle land. 2001. T he evol utiona ry
impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:
5446-5451.
Ou, C.H., K.C. Lu, and Y.H. Tseng. 2006. Study on classification
and spatial patterns of Shei-Pa National Park. I. Research
report, S hei-Pa National Park, Construction and Planning
Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan. (In Chinese)
Paiaro, V., A. Mangeaud, and
E. Pucheta. 2007. Alien seedling
recruitment as a response to altitude and soil disturbance in
the mountain grasslands of central Argentina. Plant Ecol.
193: 279-291.
Parker, I.M., J. Rodriguez, and M.E. Loik. 2003. An evolutionary
approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local
adaptation and general-purpos e genotypes in the weed
Verbascum thapsus. Conserv. Biol. 17: 59-72.
P auc hard, A., P.B. Alabac k and E.G. Edlund. 2003. Pl ant
invas ions in protected areas at multiple s cales: L inaria
vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae) in the west Yellowstone area.
West. North Am. Naturalist 63: 416-428.
Perelman, S.B., S.E. Burkart, and R.J.C. Leon. 2003. The role
of a native tussock grass (Paspalum quadrifarium Lam.)
in structuring plant communities in the flooding Pampa
grasslands. Biodiversity Conserv. 12: 225-238.
Pino, J ., X. F ont, J. Carbo, M. Jove, and L. Pallares . 2005.
Large-scale correlates of alien plant invasion in Catalonia
(NE of Spain). Biodiversity Conserv. 122: 339-350.
Pistorale, S., R. Wolff, and O. Bazzigalupi. 1999. Dormancy
and seed germ ination in natural populations of Bromus
catharticus Vahl (Cebadilla criolla). J. Genet. Breed. 53:
47-55.
Py.ek, P. 1998. Alien and native species in Central European
urban floras: a quantitative comparison. J. Biogeogr. 25:
155-163.
Py. ek, P., D.M. Richa rds on, M. Rej manek, G.L. Webs ter,
M. Williamson, and J . Kirs chner. 2004. Alien plants in
c hec klis ts and flo ra s : towards bet ter co mm unica tion
between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131-143.
Rejmanek, M. 1996. Species richness and resistance to
invasions. In G.H. Orians, R. Dirzo, J.H. Cushman (eds.),
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests,
Vol. 122. Springer, New York, pp. 153-172.
Richards, C.L., O. Bossdorf, N.Z. Muth, J. Gurevitch, and M.
Pigliucci. 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some. On the
role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 9:
981-993.
Richardson, D.M. and W. Thuiller. 2007. Home away from home
- Objective mapping of high-risk s ource areas for plant
introductions. Divers. Distrib. 13: 299-312.
Richardson, D.M., M. Rouget, S.J. Ralston, R.M. Crowling, B.J.
Van Rensburg, and W. Thuiller. 2005. Species richness of
alien plants in South Africa: environmental correlates and
the relations hip with indigenous plant s pecies richness.
Ecoscience 12: 391-402.
Rogers, G.M. and J.R. Leathwick. 1996. North island seral
tussock grasslands. 3. The influence of heather (Calluna
vulgaris) on rates of change from tus sock grass land to
shrubland. N. Z. J. Bot. 1996: 473-487.
Rose, M. and L. He rm anutz. 2004. Are boreal ecos ystem s
susceptible to alien plant invasion. Evidence from protected
areas. Oecologia 139: 467-477.
Ross, K.A., B.J. Fox, and M.D. F ox. 2002. Changes to plant
s pe ci es ri ch nes s i n fore s t fra gm en ts : fr agm en t a ge,
disturbance and fire history may be as important as area. J.
Biogeogr. 29: 749-765.
Rowlands, P.G. and N.J. Brian. 2001. Fishtail Mesa: A vegetation
resurvey of a relict area in Grand Canyon National Park,
Arizona. West. North Am. Naturalist 61: 159-181.
Schwarz, A.G. and R.W. Wein. 1997. Threatened dry grasslands
in the continental boreal forests of Wood Buffalo National
Park. Can. J. Bot. 75: 1363-1370.
Simberloff, D. 1995. Why do introduced species appear to
pg_0010
226
Botanical Studies, Vol. 50, 2009
devastate islands more than mainland areas. Pac. Sci. 49:
87-97.
Theoharides, K.A. and J.S. Dukes. 2007. Plant invasion across
s pace and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species
success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 176:
256-273.
Thuiller, W., D.M. Richardson, M. Rouget, S . P roches, and
J .R.U. Wilson. 2006. Interactions between environment,
s pecies traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant
invasions. Ecology 87: 1755-1769.
Tseng, C.S. 1999. Studies on population ecology of the
F ormosan L and-locked S almon, Oncorhynchus masou
formosanus. II. Research report, Shei-Pa National Park,
Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior,
Taiwan. (In Chinese)
Vitousek, P.M., C.M. D¡¦Antonio, L.L. Loope, M. Rejmanek,
and R. Westbrooks. 1997. Introduced species: A significant
components of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol.
21: 1-16.
Wang, C.M. 1995. The ec ologi cal environme nt of Wuling
d i s t ri c t. R e s ea r c h r e po rt , S he i -P a Na t io na l P ar k,
Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior,
Taiwan. (In Chinese)
Wa rren, J .M. 2000. the role of white c lover in the los s of
diversity in grassland habitat restoration. Restor. Ecol. 8:
318-323.
Wein, R.W., G. Wein, S. Bahret, and W.J. Cody. 1992.
Northward invasding non-native vascular plant species in
and adjacent to Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada. Can.
Field-Nat. 106: 216-224.
Wilson, J.R.U., D.M. Richardson, M. Rouget, .. Proche., M.A.
Amis, L. Henderson, and W. Thuiller. 2007. Residence time
and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling
plant invasions. Divers. Distrib. 13: 11-22.
Wolf, J.J., S.W. Beatty, and T.R. Seastedt. 2004. Soil
characteristics of Rocky Mountain National Park grasslands
invasded by Melilotus officinalis and M. alba. J. Biogeogr.
31: 415-424.
Wolff, R., L. Abbott, and S. Pi stora le. 1996. Re produc tive
behaviour of Bromus catharticus Vahl (Cebadilla criolla)
in natural and cultivated populations. J. Genet. Breed. 50:
121-128.
Wolff, R., L. Abbott, and S. Pi stora le. 2001. Reproduc tive
strategy of Bromus catharticus Vahl (Cebadilla criolla):
Phenotypic plasticity in natural population progenies. J.
Genet. Breed. 55: 67-74.
Wu, S.H., C.F. Hsieh, S.M. Chaw, and M. Rejmanek. 2004a.
Plant invasions in Taiwan: Insights from the flora of casual
and naturalized alien species. Divers. Distrib. 10: 349-362.
Wu, S.H., C.F. Hsieh, and M. Rejmanek. 2004b. Catalogue of
the naturalized flora of Taiwan. Taiwania 49: 16-31.
Wuerthner, G. 1996. Alien invasion. National Parks 70: 32-35.
pg_0011
WU et al. ¡X Plant invasions in the areas of Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan
227
pg_0012