Botanical Studies (2008) 49: 177-188.
*
Corresponding author: E-mail: chtsou@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
TECHNICAL REPORT
Technical report on the molecular phylogeny of Camellia
with nrITS: the need for high quality DNA and PCR
amplification with Pfu-DNA polymerase
Kunjupillai VIJAYAN and Chih-Hua TSOU*
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 115, ROC
(Received May 17, 2007; Accepted December 6, 2008)
ABSTRACT.
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nrDNA has been widely employed for reconstructing
phylogenetic relationships in plants, especially at the species level. Previous attempts to reconstruct the
molecular phylogeny of Camellia based on nrITS, however, have not succeeded due to technical difficulties.
In order to identify the major factors responsible for these difficulties and also to assess the efficacy of
nrITS in elucidating the interspecific relationships of Camellia, the present investigation was conducted with
seven closely or distantly related species. The purity of the DNA was found to be one of the major factors
affecting the success of PCR amplification and the errors in the sequences. Therefore, an efficient protocol has
been developed for extracting genomic DNA from dried leaf samples of Camellia. The purity of the DNA,
extracted using this method, was quite good as revealed by the A260/A280 ratio, which ranged from 1.84 to 1.89.
Further investigation on the effect of DNA polymerases on PCR induced variations revealed that the PCR
error rate was much higher in Taq-amplified sequences than Pfu-amplified sequences. The effect of the error
on phylogenetic analysis was evident from the wide dispersal of Ta q-amplified sequences across the gene tree
while the Pfu-amplified sequences from the same sample joined together to form a single clade. Our extensive
study of Camellia based on Pfu-amplified ITS sequences showed well-resolved interspecies relationships.
Since the results of the molecular phylogenetic investigation of Camellia needs to be reported in a series, due
to the technical and scientific complexity of the work, in this first report, we provide technical and scientific
insights into the major factors responsible for the failure of the PCR amplification, the occurrence of high
sequencing errors, and their effect on the phylogenetic interpretations. The results further stress the potential
of nrITS in deducing the phylogenetic relationships in Camellia.
Keywords: Camellia; DNA isolation; ITS; PCR error; Pfu; Ta q polymerase.
INTRODUCTION
Molecular phylogeny based on DNA sequences
has recently been used extensively to resolve intricate
problems at various taxonomic levels. The internal
transcribed spacer (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA
has been the most widely used molecular marker in
resolving phylogeny at the generic and specific levels
in the angiosperms (Baldwin et al., 1995; Alvarez and
Wendel, 2003). More than two-thirds of the related papers
published during 1998 to 2002 and in 2005 included
nrITS in the analyses (Alvarez and Wendel, 2003; Feliner
and Rossello, 2007). The advantages as well as the
disadvantages of nrITS in the phylogenetic application
have also been well explored (Buckler et al., 1997; Alvarez
and Wendel, 2003; Feliner and Rossello, 2007). Although
general concerns have been raised about its sequence
complexity and the existence of infra-species or even
infra-individual variations, which impact the accuracy of
the phylogeny being deduced, its advantages at a specific
level of phylogeny are unsurpassed by any other markers.
Recently, it has become customary that whenever nrITS
is used for phylogenetic analysis, a segment of plastid or
mitochondrial sequences is also incorporated to make a
comparison.
The genus Camellia, the largest genus in the family
Theaceae, is equally important for both the horticultural
and beverage industries. It is mainly distributed in East
Asia, with Southwest China as the center of distribution
(Ming, 2000). Taxonomically, the most popular
classification systems proposed by Chang (1981, 1998)
and Ming (2000) are very different. For example, Chang
recognized 284 species and treated them in 22 sections,
but Ming recognized 119 species and 14 sections only. The
difficulty in reaching a well-accepted classification system
resides in the large number of the species having natural
hybridizations (Ming, 2000) and in the great number of