Botanical Studies (2008) 49: 225-233.
* 
Corresponding  author:  E-mail:  sbzhang@mail.kib.ac.cn; 
Tel: 86-0871-5223002; Fax: 86-0871-5223005.
INTRODUCTION
The majority of the 49 species in the genus Meconopsis 
grow at high  elevations (2,135-5,795 m) in the Himalayas 
and  other mountains in western China. Only M. cambrica 
can be  found in Europe (Chuang,  1981). As famous 
horticultural  plants  bearing  large  and  beautiful  flowers, 
Meconopsis have attracted the attention of botanists. Some 
Meconopsis species can be used as  traditional  herbal 
medicine, for they possess anti-inflammatory and analgesic 
activities  (Samant  et  al.,  2005).  Several  members  of  the 
genus have been cultivated over 100 years, but cultivating 
Meconopsis  is not  an easy task because  of the poor 
performance at lower altitude,  especially in  summer (Ren, 
 1993;  Still  et  al.,  2003).  In  addition,  habitat  destruction 
has  increasingly  threatened  these  valuable  gene  pools, 
which  are  now  limited  to  a  narrow  range  of  distribution 
(Sulaiman and Babu, 1996). 
Empirical  observations  suggest  that  high  temperature 
during  the  growing  season  is  an  important  determinant 
limiting  the growth and development of Meconopsis 
(Norton and  Qu, 1987; Ren, 1993).  However, the 
adaptation  of  Meconopsis  to  temperature  is  significantly 
different  across  species  (Ren,  1993).  Both  M.  punicea 
and  M.  betonicifolia  grown  in  colder  temperatures  have 
a larger dry weight and flower  size than those grown 
in warmer conditions (Still et al.,  2003). Meconopsis 
integrifolia  can  flower  in  its  native  habitat  even  in  the 
snow.  This  remarkable  tolerance  for  low  temperatures 
would  lead to poor adaptation in warm temperatures. The 
growth  and  survival  of  plants  can  be  determined  by  the 
Photosynthetic adaptation of  Meconopsis  integrifolia 
Franch. and M. horridula var. racemosa Prain
Shi-Bao ZHANG* and Hong HU
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, P. R. China
(Received May 29, 2007; Accepted March 5, 2008)
ABSTRACT.
  Both  Meconopsis  integrifolia  Franch.  and  M.  horridula  var.  racemosa  Maxim.  are  native 
to  the  Himalayas  and  prized  as  ornamentals  and  medicinal  plants.  Cultivating  Meconopsis  is  difficult  at 
lower  altitudes  owing  to  its  intolerance  to  hot  summers.  To  develop  a  cultivation  strategy  and  predict  plant 
performance  for  introduction,  we  compared  the  photosynthetic  capacity  of  M.  integrifolia  and  M.  horridula 
as  well  as  their  photosynthetic  responses  to  light  and temperature  in  the  nursery  at  an  altitude  of  3,260  m. 
Meconopsis integrifolia was more sensitive  to high temperature  than M. horridula while M. horridula reached 
a  peak photosynthetic  rate  at a  higher  light  level  than  M.  integrifolia.  Compared  with  M.  integrifolia,  M. 
horridula showed a higher light saturated photosynthetic rate, maximum RuBP saturated rate of carboxylation, 
light saturated rate of electron transport, stomatal conductance, leaf dry mass, and N content per unit area. The 
mesophyll  conductance  and  leaf  N  content  per  unit  mass  of  the  two  species  were  not  significantly  different. 
The  differences in  photosynthetic  capacity  between  two  Meconopsis  species  were  correlated  with  their 
biochemical  efficiency and leaf  thickness,  but  not  chlorophyll  content  or  mesophyll  conductance. The  results 
suggest  that,  at  lower  altitudes, introducting  and  cultivating  M.  horridula  could  be  easier  owing  to  its  wider 
physiological adaptation.
Keywords: Chlorophyll fluorescence; Leaf traits;  Meconopsis; Photosynthesis; Physiological adaptation.
Abbreviations: AQE,  apparent  CO
2 
quantum  efficiency  (mol  CO
2
  mol  photons
-1
);  Chl,  chlorophyll  content 
per unit area (mg dm
-2
); F
v
/F
m
, potential quantum  yield of PSII; LMA, leaf dry mass per unit area (g m
-2
); N
a
, 
nitrogen  content  per  unit area (g  m
-2
);  N
m
,  nitrogen  content  per  unit  mass  (mg  g
-1
);  T
opt
,  optimal  temperature 
for  photosynthesis;  PPFD,  photosynthetic  photon  flux  density  (£gmol  m
-2
s
-1
); £pPSII,  effective  quantum  yield 
of  PSII;  F
v
¡¦/F
m
¡¦,  efficiency  of excitation energy  capture  by  open reaction  centre;  ETR,  apparent  rate  of elec-
tron  transport  of  PSII  (£gmol  m
-2
s
-1
);  qP,  photochemical  quenching;  NPQ,  non-photochemical  quenching;  P
N
, 
photosynthetic  rate  (£gmol  m
-2
s
-1
);  P
Nmax
,  light-saturated  P
N
  (£gmol  m
-2
s
-1
);  g
m
,  mesophyll  conductance  (mol 
m
-2
s
-1
);  g
s
,  stomatal  conductance  (mol  m
-2
s
-1
);  J
max
,  light  saturated  rate  of  electron  transport  (£gmol  m
 -2
s
-1
); 
V
cmax
, maximum RuBP saturated rate of carboxylation (£gmol m
-2
s
-1
).
 PHYSIOLOGY