Botanical Studies (2008) 49: 235-241.
* 
Corresponding author: E-mail: ffh@fct.unl.pt; Tel: 
+351-21-2948500; Fax: +351-21-2954461.
INTRODUCTION
Many  leaf  chimeras  arise  from  mutations  that  disrupt 
chl  synthesis or accumulation  and are phenotypically 
detectable  by  their  lighter  green color.  It is  well 
established  that  most  chl  in  chloroplasts  serve  only  as 
antenna  pigments  in  photosynthesis,  capturing  incident 
photons and transferring the resulting excitation energy  to 
reaction  centers,  where  a  minor,  photochemically  active 
chl  fraction  uses  it  to  drive  a  charge  separation  process. 
Thus,  mutations  that  cause  only  loss  of  chl,  even  if  to  a 
relatively  large extent, should not necessarily result in the 
leaf ¡¦s inability to carry on photosynthesis. However, it has 
been  reported  that  pronounced  chl  deficiency  affects  the 
synthesis and/or assembly of other chloroplast components 
with  which  the  chl interacts  in  vivo  (Henriques  and  Park, 
1975;  Cumming  and  Bonnet,  1983;  Green  et  al.,  1988; 
Klein  et  al.,  1988). This  is  the  case,  for  instance,  of  the 
 chl b-less  mutant of barley,  which  is not only deprived of 
chl  b,  but  also  of  several  major  chloroplast  polypeptides 
that  act as scaffolds  for the assembly  of the  chl  a,  b  light-
harvesting complex in the thylakoid membrane (Henriques 
and  Park,  1975;  Burke  et  al.,  1979).  Over  the  past  two 
decades,  it has been shown that a block in pigment 
biosynthesis,  either  of chl  or  car,  causes the accumulation 
of intermediates that act as signals regulating  the 
expression of  nuclear-encoded plastid-destined gene 
products  (Kropat  et  al.,  1997;  Rodermel,  2001;  Strand  et 
al.,  2003;  Nott  et  al.,  2006;  Reinbothe  et  al.,  2006). As  a 
consequence,  leaf  chimeras  with  largely  reduced pigment 
content often possess additional chloroplast alterations and 
show  more  or  less  extensive  photosynthetic  impairments. 
The  functional characterization of  these pigment 
chimeras,  thus,  frequently  proves  to  be  rather  complex, 
and attempts to identify the specific  change(s) responsible 
for  the  photosynthetic  disturbance(s)  turn  out  immensely 
challenging (Sommerville, 1986).
We  report  here  data  on  pigment  content  and  certain 
photosynthetic  characteristics  of  mutated  leaves  from 
Photosynthetic  characteristics  of  light-sensitive, 
chlorophyll-deficient  leaves  from  sectorially  chimeric 
stinging-nettle
Fernando S. HENRIQUES*
Plant Biology Unit, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
(Received August 8, 2007; Accepted March 12, 2008)
ABSTRACT.
  Mutated  leaves  of  sectorially  chimeric  stinging  nettle  (Urtica  dioica  L.)  showed  decreased 
pigment content  and  reduced  photosynthetic  activity.  Relative  to  their wild  type  siblings,  the  mutated  leaves 
were  not  only  largely depleted  in  total  chl  and  car,  suggestive  of  a  significant  loss  of  photosynthetic  units, 
they  also  exhibited  much  higher  chl  a/b  ra tios,  indicative  of  a  major  reduc tion  in  the  a ntenna  size  of  the 
remaining  photosynthetic  units.  Light  and  electron  microscopy confirmed  a  notable  decrease  in  chloroplast 
number  in  mutated  leaves,  and  analysis  of  polypeptide  composition  revealed  a  large  depletion  of  the 
apoprotein  of  PSII  antenna  in  these  chloroplasts.  The  photosynthetic  units  present  in  mutated  leaves  showed 
an intrinsic  photochemical efficiency, measured as the variable to maximum fluorescence ratio of dark-adapted 
leaves,  only  slightly  lower  than  controls,  and  their  concentration  correlated  strongly  with  the  leaves¡¦s  net 
CO
2
  uptake  capacity.  It  is  concluded  that  mutated  leaves  of  stinging  nettle  underwent  a  gradual  chloroplast 
loss  during  development,  but  the  remaining  organelles  preserved  much  of  their  photosynthetic  competence. 
This  chloroplast  loss  most  likely  arises  from an  accumulation  of  chl  precursors  that  repress  the  synthesis  of 
photosynthetic essential proteins and act as photosensitizers for chloroplast degradation.
Keywords:  Chimerism;  Chlorophyll  fluorescence;  Chloroplast  peptides;  Photosynthetic  net  CO
2
  uptake; 
Urtica dioica L.
Abbreviations:  Car, Carotenoids; Chl, Chlorophyll; F
 O
,  F
 m
,  F
 v
, Minimum, maximum and variable 
fluorescence  of  dark-adapted  leaves,  respectively;  LHC-II,  Light-harvesting  chl  a,b-protein  complex  of 
PSII;  PQ, Plastoquinone;  PSI,  PSII, Photosystems I and II,  respectively;  PSU,  Photosynthetic unit; Q
A
,  PSII 
primary electron acceptor.
 PHYSIOLOGY